|
|
|
Item Details
Title:
|
VIEWS INTO THE CHINESE ROOM
NEW ESSAYS ON SEARLE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE |
By: |
John Preston (Editor), Mark Bishop (Editor) |
Format: |
Paperback |
List price:
|
£65.00 |
Our price: |
£56.88 |
Discount: |
|
You save:
|
£8.12 |
|
|
|
|
ISBN 10: |
0199252777 |
ISBN 13: |
9780199252770 |
Availability: |
Usually dispatched within 1-3 weeks.
Delivery
rates
|
Stock: |
Currently 0 available |
Publisher: |
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS |
Pub. date: |
1 August, 2002 |
Pages: |
428 |
Description: |
The most famous challenge to the aims of computational cognitive science and artificial intelligence is the philosopher John Searle's 1980 'Chinese Room' argument. Searle argued that the fact that machines can be devised to pass the 'Turing Test', that is, respond to input with the same output that a mind would give, does not mean that mind and machine are doing the same thing: for such machines lack understanding of the symbols they process. Nineteen speciallywritten essays by leading scientists and philosophers assess, renew, and respond to this crucial challenge-fascinating reading for anyone interested in minds and computers. |
Synopsis: |
The most famous challenge to the aims of cognitive science and artificial intelligence is the philosopher John Searle's 1980 'Chinese Room' argument. Searle argued that the fact that machines can be devised to respond to input with the same output that a mind would give does not mean that mind and machine are doing the same thing: for the latter lacks understanding. Nineteen specially written essays by leading scientists and philosophers assess, renew, and respond to this crucial challenge-fascinating reading for anyone interested in minds and computers. |
Illustrations: |
2 halftones, line figures |
Publication: |
UK |
Imprint: |
Clarendon Press |
Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
|
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|