 |
|
|
Item Details
| Title:
|
THEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION AND ISAIAH 53
A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF BERNHARD DUHM, BREVARD CHILDS, AND ALEC MOTYER |
| By: |
Charles E. Shepherd |
| Format: |
Paperback |
| List price:
|
£37.99 |
|
We currently do not stock this item, please contact the publisher directly for
further information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ISBN 10: |
0567664996 |
| ISBN 13: |
9780567664990 |
| Publisher: |
BLOOMSBURY PUBLISHING PLC |
| Pub. date: |
27 August, 2015 |
| Series: |
The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies |
| Pages: |
312 |
| Synopsis: |
This study brings together the hermeneutical approaches of three Old Testament scholars, specifically as they pertain to the interpretation of Isaiah 52.13-53.12 in the framework of Christian theology. Contemporary discourse and hermeneutical discussions have led to the development of a point of confusion in theological hermeneutics, focusing on what relationship older frames of reference may have with those more recent. Bernhard Duhm is presented as a history-of-Religion scholar who does not easily abide by popular understandings of that school. Brevard Childs moves outward from particular historical judgments regarding the nature of redaction and form criticism, attempting to arrive at a proximately theological reading of the poem. Alec Motyer's evangelical commitments represent a large constituency of contemporary theological readership, and a popular understanding of Isaiah 53. Following a summary and critical engagement of each interpreter on his own terms, the study analyzes the use of rhetoric behind the respective readings of Isaiah 53, and proposes theological reading as a highly eclectic undertaking, distanced from the demarcations of `pre-critical', `critical', and `post-critical'. |
| Publication: |
UK |
| Imprint: |
T.& T.Clark Ltd |
| Returns: |
Returnable |
|
|
|
 |
Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr
A celebratory, inclusive and educational exploration of Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr for both children that celebrate and children who want to understand and appreciate their peers who do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|